For a start Libya is not a middle-Eastern country, it's a British state of Africa. That's right, it's fucking British. It comes under the state of Britain and officially takes orders from the UN and is part of the UN committee along with all the other major contributors. Knowing that fact is very important because it means that you can understand that it is not ruled by dictatorship for a start and it is not an independent nation and it is also a relatively wealthy nation not some barren desert country like Iraq or Iran.
Secondly President Muammar Gaddafi is not a colonel and that title is completely wrong. His project does not classify as a regime more of a military action. It was originally backed by the UN and they gave their consent to the motion at the UN meeting.
Next Gaddafi never said he would march on the town, search every house and force them out into Egypt like dogs. I have no idea where that speech has come from since none of the footage of his speeches say that. I got it translated by another British guy BTW and got it confirmed by a Japanese guy, an American, a German and a Chinese man. I am currently waiting for a Pakistani translation, Hindi, Thai, Russian, French, Italian, Spanish, South African, Egyptian, Saudi Arabian, Greek, Australian, Canadian and Brazilian. I can't get a Mexican one though so can someone help me with that.
Next Gaddafi removed his airforce immediately after the restricted air space was put in place and then removed his ground forces immediately when the ceasefire was called.
Then Lebanon put forward the motion with the absolute requirement that the UN did not take control of Libya. It was a direct message and they said that if these rules were broken that they would rally Russia against the UN.
In response the UN said they would not occupy the country but would do so in the coming years and that they would maintain restrictions of travel, traffic and resources after their actions and that the countries wealth and resources are now property of the allied nations opposing the Libya movement.
Lebanon has already started negotiations with Russia and China about the events in the meeting and have already set up trade agreements amongst themselves. For those that don't know, trade agreements are like the backhanders that governments give each other to concrete agreements.
Gaddafi basically lowered his arms and said that if the UN were to attack now it would be a symbol that the west cannot be trusted and that Lebanon should start making agreements amongst the new UN nations towards actions of rebellion.
Since the EU's take-over of the middle-east the middle-eastern countries have got faster trade, more wealth, more resources, better control of their resources and their own independent political control.
The middle-east also has strong trade arches with Russia who as well as a supplier of work-force and resources also have the capabilities of manufacturing arms and supplying limitless resources of nuclear weapons.
Pissing off the middle-east now would be the dumbest thing the UN could ever do and Gaddafi knows this. He deliberately laid down his arms as France was already on it's way to carpet bomb the Libyan capital.
A city by the way that has no military force capabilities as yet and is completely defenseless. This is deliberate so that if we were to attack them it would be seen as picking on the poor defenseless Libyan government.
Gaddafi has already handed over his military equipment to the UN but somehow I've just seen some footage of explosions going off in Libya. How the fuck has he done it without weapons of any sort?
Now Gaddafi can say that we have staged it and we are trying to frame him for war crimes and such. Watch the fuck out UN you don't know what you are dealing with here.
I have no doubt Gaddafi is the one who is in the wrong he just smacks me as everything our politicians do but he is a fucking clever man.
Gaddafi is no Saddam.
Saddam was a wordsmith and a visionary, he thought he could take the west head on and liked to talk with charm to his people to get them to like him.
Gaddafi is a politician.
He plays the political game, following all the rules as the game changes and exploits all the loopholes to make everyone else look bad make himself look like he's in the right.
The one thing preventing a nuclear cold war with the middle-east is that the middle-east trusts the UN.
- The UN have already broken UN regulations to put forward the attacking motion toward Libya.
- They already broke the stipulations of the agreement of the committee to bring forward the policy and their military actions.
- And now they are proposing attacking a country that is technically at peace. Due to UN rules this classifies as an act of war.
Legally any nation that would like to take part is perfectly legally allowed to wage war on the UN due to their rule breaking and China has got the power to deny, refuse or discredit their policy and has the ability to count it as an illegal agreement and state that acting on it in itself is counted as a war crime.
Essentially the only thing stopping other nations from attacking the UN is the benefits made by an alliance but if the opinionated, allied, patriotic and righteous (that is contextually correct) middle-eastern governments decide to fight against the UN it could persuade other more powerful nations to take part.
The US has about 100 times the number of nukes as the next one down, Russia has about 10 times that and China has about twice what Russia has.
China and Russia are both allied with their disagreement of the UN's actions regarding both the agreement and their treatment of it's restrictions.
China doesn't want to make enemies of the US because they still have enough nukes to level China and Russia doesn't because the US has enough to take out all of Russia's major cities.
This is why the US is developing the rail gun. The rail gun is the only weapon that can defend against nukes. Despite popular myth there is no way a nuke that has already been launched can be stopped.
That is why no country has launched any so far.
If China gets some alliance with the middle-east they can amount a substantial force and force the western alliance to agree on their policies or face nuclear war.
That is a damn good enough reason not to launch an attack on Libya.
Libya is merely the guy who's goading the west into an attack. If we respond then they we lose favor with the east and that means making enemies with the 2 most powerful nations.
It would be stupid to wage war now even with good reason without explicitly making agreements with the Libyan government.
It's a ticking time bomb and Gaddafi is pouring petrol all over the thing while we are looking for somewhere to drop our match after lighting up.
No comments:
Post a Comment